“…because it could imply a point of view or an opinion.”
One more name
In 1994 the fourth edition of the psychiatrists’ manual, DSM-IV, kept the two names of 1980, alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence. The fifth, in May 2013, folded them into one, alcohol use disorder, found in “anyone meeting any 2 of the 11 criteria during the same 12-month period,” as the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism sums it up, and called mild, moderate or severe by how many. The institute calls it “a medical condition,” and adds, “Considered a brain disorder, AUD can be mild, moderate, or severe.”
The brain had come in from the laboratories. In 1997 Alan Leshner, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, argued in Science that addiction is a brain disease, and that it matters. “Addiction is a brain disease expressed in the form of compulsive behavior,” he wrote in 2001. The American Society of Addiction Medicine wrote the brain into its definition of addiction in 2011, and in 2019 called addiction “a treatable, chronic medical disease involving complex interactions among brain circuits, genetics, the environment, and an individual’s life experiences.”
Others answered. In 2014 about ninety scientists wrote to Nature that they disagreed with its “one-dimensional view that addiction is a disease.” That year the psychiatrist Sally Satel and the psychologist Scott Lilienfeld argued that the model “obscures the dimension of choice in addiction,” and in 2015 the neuroscientist Marc Lewis called his book The Biology of Desire: Why Addiction Is Not a Disease. Six researchers defending the model in 2021 granted that “some of these criticisms have merit,” but held that “the foundational premise that addiction has a neurobiological basis is fundamentally sound.”
There were medicines for it, too. The Food and Drug Administration approved disulfiram, sold as Antabuse, for alcohol dependence in 1951, naltrexone in 1994 and acamprosate in 2004. AA’s pamphlet on medications, which replaced an older one in 1984, says that “No A.A. member should ‘play doctor’; all medical advice and treatment should come from a qualified physician.”
These pages take no side, and nothing on them is medical advice. Questions about drinking and its treatment belong with a doctor; Come Early, Stay Late answers a newcomer’s questions about AA.
In May 2013 the psychiatrists’ manual settled on a new name: alcohol use disorder. It could be mild, moderate or severe, counted by how many of eleven signs a person showed in a year.
By then the argument had moved into the brain. In 1997 the head of the National Institute on Drug Abuse called addiction a brain disease, and the addiction doctors later wrote the brain into their own definition. About ninety scientists answered that addiction was more than a brain gone wrong, and others called it learning, or choice. The model’s defenders granted that some of that had merit, but held that addiction has a basis in the brain.
AA kept out of it. In 1993 its Conference took the word position out of one of its pamphlets, so as not to seem to hold an opinion. Its pamphlets still mostly call alcoholism an illness. And one of them says no member should play doctor.